Make the call.
Then see why it gets missed at scale.
Examiner's Desk shows you a synthetic medical claim and asks for the adjudication call — pay, deny, pend, or adjust. Then it gives you two things back: a veteran examiner's teardown of the right answer, and the systems-level view of the edit, rule, or workflow that prevents the miss upstream.
Every scenario has three beats
Anyone can publish a quiz that stops at the right answer. The third beat is the point.
The call
A synthetic claim on a clean examiner worktable — eligibility, provider, service lines, prior auth. You pick the disposition and get the rationale for whatever you chose.
The teardown
How a veteran examiner actually reads the claim — the tell, the trap, and the thing newer examiners trip on. Plain English, in the examiner's voice.
The systems view
How often it's missed, the root cause, and the upstream fix — the edit, plan-config rule, training gap, or workflow redesign that prevents it at scale.
Sample scenarios
These four are DRAFT templates — one per difficulty, spanning distinct categories — so the structure is visible end to end. The full authored library is written by hand.
The claim that sat in a drawer
What is the correct disposition for this claim?
Covered yesterday, not today
What is the correct disposition for this claim?
The claim that came back twice
What is the correct disposition for this claim?
The E/M that came along for the ride
What is the correct disposition for this claim?
Train your examiners on this.
Examiner's Desk is a learning-and-development tool for claims teams — onboard examiners faster, lower error and rework rates, and standardize judgment. The public simulator is free; team deployments add a private, tailored library and progress tracking.